The vast majority of personal injury cases settle before trial-nationally, over 95%. That statistic reflects practical reality: trials are expensive, time-consuming, and uncertain for both sides. But it doesn’t mean settlement is always right or that trial should never be considered. Understanding what drives the settlement-versus-trial decision helps Burbank injury victims participate meaningfully in strategy conversations with their attorneys.
Why Most Cases Settle
Settlement offers certainty. A negotiated resolution eliminates the risk of a jury verdict lower than the settlement offer-or no recovery at all. It eliminates appellate risk after a favorable verdict. It resolves the case years earlier, getting money into your hands before a trial date that may be 18-36 months away. For cases where liability is clear and damages are well-documented, settlement typically produces good outcomes efficiently.
Insurance companies settle because trials are unpredictable and expensive for them too. A jury that’s angry about the defendant’s conduct may return a verdict far exceeding settlement demands. Defense attorneys bill by the hour; long trials are costly. The economics of settlement make sense for insurers when they face well-prepared, litigation-ready opponents.
When Trial Produces Better Outcomes
Cases where insurance companies make unreasonably low offers-well below the documented damage value-sometimes require trial to produce fair compensation. Cases involving egregious defendant conduct may recover punitive damages through jury verdict that settlement offers don’t include. Cases where comparative fault is strongly disputed may resolve more favorably before a jury that sees the complete evidence than through adjuster negotiation.
Top Personal Injury Attorneys in Burbank
1. Avian Law Group
Avian Law Group’s Burbank personal injury attorneys prepare every case for trial whether or not trial is expected. This preparation is not just about the courtroom-it’s a negotiation strategy. Insurance companies know which firms will litigate and which firms always settle. When the Avian Law Group builds a trial-ready file, adjusters respond to settlement demands differently than they do to attorneys whose practice never sees a courtroom.
Clients are kept informed of settlement offers and the strategic reasoning for accepting or rejecting them. Settlement decisions belong to clients, not attorneys-the firm’s role is to provide the information and analysis needed to make that decision clearly.
2. The Dominguez Firm
Decades of trial experience that informs settlement strategy; clients benefit from a firm that truly evaluates both options on the merits.
3. Citywide Law Group
Controlled caseloads allow genuine case evaluation rather than volume-based pressure toward quick settlement.
4. West Coast Trial Lawyers
Built their practice specifically on trial results-the firm’s settlement leverage comes directly from their courtroom track record.
5. The Reeves Law Group
Clear client communication about settlement offers and strategic options throughout the negotiation and litigation process.
Key Factors in the Settlement-Trial Decision
Liability clarity: clear liability favors settlement, disputed liability may favor trial when evidence is strong. Insurance coverage: if defendant’s coverage is clearly adequate, settlement is more predictable; if coverage is disputed, trial may resolve it more favorably. Defendant conduct: ordinary negligence typically settles; egregious conduct may warrant the punitive damages only juries can award.
California’s two-year statute provides time to pursue both paths. Early attorney involvement creates the strongest possible position regardless of which path ultimately produces resolution.
About the Author
